Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41801441›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2026

Factors affecting the anatomical localization of proximal femoral fractures in geriatric patients.

Eda Yıldırım, Ömer Erşen, Harun Yasin Tüzün, Mustafa Kara

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eda YıldırımDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Başkale State Hospital, Tepebaşı St, Başkale, Van, 65600, Turkey. yldrmeddaa@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1759-2009
Ömer ErşenDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University of Health Sciences Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7351-6305
Harun Yasin TüzünDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University of Health Sciences Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7348-9976
Mustafa KaraDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University of Health Sciences Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-0081-5648

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aims to investigate the relationship between proximal femoral geometry and the anatomical localization of proximal femoral fractures in geriatric patients. The analysis was based on morphometric measurements obtained from the contralateral, uninjured hip.

methodsBetween January 2017 and December 2024, 864 patients (549 females, 315 males; mean age: 80.09 ± 7.65 years) with proximal femoral fractures were retrospectively analyzed. Fractures were classified as subcapital, transcervical, basicervical, intertrochanteric, or subtrochanteric according to standardized radiographic criteria. Morphometric parameters measured on anteroposterior pelvic radiographs of the contralateral hip included hip axis length (HAL), femoral neck axial length (FNAL), femoral neck and head diameters, femoral shaft diameter, caput-collum-diaphyseal (CCD) angle, medial femoral offset, and center-edge (CE) angle. Absolute and proportional values (relative to HAL and FNAL) were compared among fracture types.

resultsExtracapsular fractures were more frequent (58.4%) than intracapsular ones (41.6%), with intertrochanteric fractures being the most common subtype (48.6%). Femoral shaft diameter, femoral shaft diameter/HAL ratio, and CE angle were all significantly greater in extracapsular fractures (p = 0.04, p = 0.003, p = 0.002). Among fracture subtypes, femoral neck diameter was higher in transcervical fractures than basicervical fractures (p = 0.046). Subcapital fractures had higher femoral neck diameter/HAL ratios than basicervical fractures (p = 0.04). Notably intertrochanteric fractures also showed higher femoral shaft diameter/HAL ratios and CE angles, but lower CCD angles than other types.

conclusionGeometric variations of the proximal femur are closely linked to the anatomical localization of fractures in geriatric patients. Incorporating morphometric evaluation into routine assessment may improve the prediction of fracture risk and support individualized management in orthopaedic trauma care.

Indexed as

FemurProximal Femoral FracturesAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleRadiographyRetrospective StudiesGeriatric traumaHip geometryMorphometric analysisProximal femur fractureRadiographic measurement

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.