ArticleJournal of neurology2026
The non-linear relationship between self-reported cognitive concerns and performance-based cognitive dysfunction in people with multiple sclerosis: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Existing research suggests a weak, inconsistent link between self-reported cognitive concerns (SCC) and performance-based measures of cognitive dysfunction in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). This study aimed to evaluate for a non-linear relationship between SCC and cognitive impairment in pwMS. A consecutive sample of 933 pwMS routinely completed the Minimal Assessment of Cognitive Function in MS (MACFIMS) battery at a Canadian neuropsychiatry clinic between 2020 and 2025. Covariates included age, sex, Expanded Disability Status Scale scores, disease duration, disease course, Wechsler Test of Adult Reading scores, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale sub-scale scores. Cognitive impairment was defined as ≥ 3 MACFIMS raw scores ≥ 1.5 SD below matched normative data. Using a grid search to identify a breakpoint in Perceived Deficits Questionnaire (PDQ) scores (to assess SCC), a segmented logistic regression analysis was undertaken to predict cognitive impairment from PDQ scores, controlling for covariates. Mean participant age was 43.34 years (SD 10.89), 75.12% were female, median EDSS was 2.00 (IQR 1.50-3.50), and 46.73% had cognitive impairment. PDQ scores ≥ 50 independently predicted increased odds of cognitive impairment (OR = 1.92, 95% CI [1.22-3.02], p = 0.0052), while PDQ scores < 50 were not associated with cognitive impairment (OR = 1.03, 95% CI [0.87-1.21], p = 0.75). In conclusion, above a critical threshold, SCC indicate increased odds of cognitive impairment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41801421What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.