ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2026
Retrospective evaluation of the mr#ENZIAN classification's applicability in the pre-operative assessment of complex endometriosis: a compartment-dependent challenge.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePelvic MRI is increasingly performed as a second-line investigation in suspected complex cases of endometriosis, to precisely localize lesions and to optimise surgical planning. To facilitate MRI evaluation and inter-disciplinary communication, several standardized structured image analysis and radiologic reporting classification systems have been proposed, including the mr#ENZIAN classification, whose applicability needs further proving. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn an attempt to further validate the #ENZIAN classification applicability to MRI, we retrospectively evaluated the results of structured and unstructured MRI analysis by #ENZIAN compartment, considering both sole lesion-detection and #ENZIAN grading, using the corresponding op#ENZIAN score as a reference and evaluating inter-rater agreement of structured mr#ENZIAN results. In total, 83 patients with surgically/histopathologically confirmed endometriosis who received a pelvic MRI within 8 months prior to surgery between 2018 and 2022 were included.
resultsConcordance of mr#ENZIAN and op#ENZIAN results proved to be highly dependent on #ENZIAN-compartment: almost perfect agreement in locations FU, FI and others (FO); substantial agreement for lesion detection and grading in O, C and P; moderate to substantial agreement in T; moderate agreement in FB; moderate to fair agreement in A and only fair to poor agreement in B and FA. Inter-rater agreement between expert radiologists proved to be almost perfect to substantial for lesion detection and grading in most compartments, with exception of A, B and FA. There were no significant differences between results of structured and unstructured MRI evaluation.
conclusionWe recommend a simplification of the mr#ENZIAN classification regarding DE, with clearer rules to differentiate and measure lesions affecting the A and B compartments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41801388What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.