ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026
Comparison of EMG responses obtained from endotracheal tube and thyroid cartilage surface electrodes in thyroidectomies performed with intraoperative nerve monitoring.
Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveComparison of electromyographic (EMG) responses obtained from endotracheal tube electrodes (ETE) and thyroid cartilage surface electrodes (TCSE) in patients undergoing thyroidectomy and/or parathyroidectomy with intraoperative recurrent laryngeal nerve monitoring. MATERIALS AND
methodsFifty-one recurrent laryngeal nerves (RLNs) at risk during 28 surgical procedures on 27 consecutive patients operated between 5 September 2022 and 21 August 2023 at Dokuz Eylül University, Department of Otorhinolaryngology were evaluated. Patients’ age, gender, body mass index (BMI), vocal cord mobility, RLN EMG signal amplitudes recorded with ETE and TCSE, and surgery-related complications were documented and analyzed.
resultsEMG signal amplitudes obtained with TCSE were significantly higher than ETE amplitudes (p = 0.001). Female patients showed higher EMG amplitudes than males with both methods (p = 0.002 and p < 0.001, respectively). TCSE measurements yielded higher amplitudes than ETE in both genders (p = 0.007 and p = 0.035, respectively). Patients < 50 years of age had significantly higher TCSE amplitudes than ETE (p < 0.001), while no significant difference was found for patients ≥ 50 years of age (p = 0.214). Left-sided TCSE amplitudes were considerably higher than right-sided ones (p = 0.004), while there was no side difference for ETE amplitudes (p > 0.05). TCSE values were considerably higher than ETE in BMI groups of < 25 kg/m² and > 30 kg/m² (p = 0.001 and p = 0.038), while no significant difference was found in the 25–30 kg/m² group (p > 0.05). One case (3.57%) experienced false loss of signal in ETE recordings due to endotracheal tube rotation, while TCSE readings remained stable. Among the 51 RLNs at risk, there was one (1.96%) transient vocal cord paralysis, and another (1.96%) transient partial vocal cord paresis. Hematoma and permanent vocal cord paralysis complications were not observed in any of the patients.
conclusionCompared to the conventional ETE method, TCSE yielded higher and more stable EMG amplitudes during intraoperative nerve monitoring. TCSE was found to be a reliable and practical alternative to ETE either as a primary method or as a rescue method when false loss of signal is suspected in ETE recordings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41801351What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.