SynthesisClinical neuroradiology2026
Diagnostic Accuracy of Machine Learning Models in Predicting Functional Outcome of Thrombectomy for Acute Posterior Circulation Artery Occlusion: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Clinical neuroradiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMechanical thrombectomy (MT) is the standard treatment for acute posterior circulation artery occlusion (PCAO), but predicting outcomes remains challenging. Existing prognostic models combine clinical, imaging, and procedural variables but show inconsistent performance. Our objective is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of Machine Learning (ML) models in predicting favorable functional outcomes of thrombectomy for acute PCAO.
methodsWe conducted a systematic review and bivariate diagnostic meta-analysis of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science. Eligible studies evaluated ML predicting favorable outcomes (Modified Rankin Scale of 0 to 3 at hospital discharge or at 90 days) after MT for PCAO. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated with a bivariate random-effects model.
resultsFive studies including 1739 patients met inclusion criteria. Pooled sensitivity was 78% (95% CI: 59-89%; I
conclusionsML models demonstrate good diagnostic accuracy in predicting functional outcomes after thrombectomy for acute PCAO. Integration of these models into clinical practice may support individualized decision-making and resource allocation, although prospective validation and improved reporting are needed before routine implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41801307What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.