Observational studyJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2026
Exploratory clinical trial on the acoustic variability index for predicting fluid responsiveness during hepatectomy.
Observational study in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The acoustic variability index (AVI), derived from continuous phonocardiographic analysis of heart sounds via an esophageal stethoscope, is a novel minimally invasive method for intraoperative hemodynamic monitoring. We evaluated the ability of AVI to predict fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing hepatectomy and compared its performance with that of the conventional indices. Forty adult patients who underwent hepatectomy were enrolled in this prospective, single-center observational study. After major surgical resection and stabilization, a 500 mL crystalloid fluid challenge was administered. Hemodynamic parameters including AVI, central venous pressure (CVP), stroke volume variation (SVV), and pulse pressure variation (PPV) were recorded before and after volume expansion. Patients with ≥ 10% increase in cardiac output (CO) were defined as responders. Thirty-seven patients were included in the final analysis, of which 12 (32.4%) were classified as responders. After fluid loading, responders showed a significant decrease in AVI (11.4% ± 2.5% to 7.8% ± 2.9%, p = 0.004), while non-responders showed no significant change (7.1% ± 3.2% to 6.3% ± 3.0%, p = 0.356). AVI demonstrated predictive performance comparable to SVV and PPV, with an optimal cutoff of > 9.8% and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.873 (95% CI: 0.743–0.967). Real-time intraoperative monitoring of the AVI shows potential as a predictor for fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing hepatectomy. AVI offers a promising, minimally invasive approach for guiding fluid therapy. Further research is warranted to validate its utility in broader surgical populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.