ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2026
Addressing Medical Deserts in Europe: Lessons From a Comparative Analysis.
Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Geographical Inequalities in the Distribution of Healthcare Specialists in Poland.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEuropean countries face a common problem of medical deserts-areas where the population has limited access to healthcare services.
objectiveThis article aims to define medical deserts and provide an in-depth overview of the factors driving desertification and the solutions applied to reduce its negative consequences across six European countries: the Netherlands, Spain, Poland, Croatia, Germany and Ireland.
methodsApplied methods include five consecutive steps: (1) development of a case study template; (2) defining criteria and selecting case study countries, (3) desk research, (4) consultation with national experts and (5) comparative analysis.
resultsThere is no formally recognised definition of medical deserts in all the analysed countries. Nevertheless, the concept is often associated with sparsely populated, isolated areas with limited access to healthcare services. The factors driving desertification are similar across the six countries and include: ageing and depopulation, health workforce deficits, unattractive working conditions and geographical factors. Solutions implemented to mitigate the negative effects of medical deserts can be classified into several broad categories: health workforce planning and monitoring, training and career pathways, innovative healthcare models, support mechanisms and infrastructure development.
conclusionsThe factors driving medical deserts in European countries are complex and multidimensional. In consequence, the policy approaches aimed at limiting their negative consequences also require a comprehensive approach. Addressing medical deserts requires focusing on both the supply and demand sides of health services provision and comprehensive strategies tailored to each country's or region's specific circumstances. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This study was conducted within the ROUTE-HWF project framework, which emphasised the importance of patient and public involvement throughout the research process. Their contribution was particularly valuable during national and international workshops with key stakeholders, including community representatives, healthcare professionals and policymakers. These stakeholder workshops focused on discussing the root causes of medical deserts and exploring national and regional strategies to address them. This inclusive approach ensured that the analysis of the factors driving desertification and potential solutions incorporated the perspectives and lived experiences of affected populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.