Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41801205›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2026

Emergency Department Visits, Hospital Admissions, and Wait Times for Patients With Urologic Conditions.

Rano Matta, Jordyn Shaw, Hodan Mohamud, Samantha Morais, Refik Saskin, Amanda Hird, Sarah Neu, Sender Herschorn, Robert K Nam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rano MattaDivision of Urology, University of Toronto, Department of Surgery, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jordyn ShawDivision of Urology, University of Toronto, Department of Surgery, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Hodan MohamudTemerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Samantha MoraisICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Refik SaskinICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Amanda HirdDivision of Urology, University of Toronto, Department of Surgery, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Sarah NeuDivision of Urology, University of Toronto, Department of Surgery, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Sender HerschornDivision of Urology, University of Toronto, Department of Surgery, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Robert K NamDivision of Urology, University of Toronto, Department of Surgery, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Increased use of the emergency department (ED) creates strain on the single-payer public health care system in Canada. Objective: To evaluate trends in ED visits and hospital admission rates for urologic conditions in Ontario, Canada, and to determine trends and associated factors for wait times to see a urologist among patients presenting to the ED. Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based, retrospective cohort study used health administrative data from all EDs and acute care hospitals in Ontario for all adult patients presenting to the ED with a primary urological diagnosis between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2022. Analyses were performed from January 2023 to April 2024. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was the rate of ED visits with new urologic diagnoses over time. Crude, age-standardized, and sex-standardized annual rates were estimated for index ED visits and hospital admissions. Wait times to see a urologist after ED visit were also determined. Results: A total of 2 192 213 unique visits to the ED with a main diagnosis of a urologic disorder were identified (mean [SD] patient age, 52.1 [21.2] years; 66.5% female). Of these, 1 732 356 visits represented a new urologic diagnosis (no visits in the prior 2 years). Age- and sex-standardized ED visit rates rose annually from 2007 (0.91 visits per 100 people) to 2015 (1.0 visits per 100 people) (rate ratio [RR], 1.10; 95% CI, 1.09-1.11), then decreased until 2020 (RR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.87-0.88), before rising again until 2022 (RR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.90-0.91). Among people seen in the ED with a urologic diagnosis, 10.0% were admitted to the hospital during the study period. The crude rate of admission rose annually (RR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.03-1.05; P < .001), from 0.07 (95% CI, 0.07-0.08) admissions per 100 people in 2007 to 0.09 (95% CI, 0.09-0.09) in 2022. Patients with greater continuity of outpatient care had lower odds of being admitted. The mean (SD) wait time to see a urologist after an ED visit increased from 62.5 (80.3) days in 2007 to 84.8 (89.3) days in 2014. It subsequently decreased annually until 2022, to 71.1 (70.6) days. Increased comorbidity was associated with lower risk of outpatient urology visit. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, the annual ED visit rates for new urologic diagnoses, hospital admissions, and wait times to see urologists significantly increased over the study period. These trends were associated with decreasing continuity of care. This increasing burden of acute urologic disease necessitates investment in health care.

Indexed as

Emergency Room VisitsEmergency Service, HospitalHospitalizationPatient AdmissionUrologic DiseasesWaiting ListsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOntarioRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsTreatment Delay

Identifiers

PMID41801205
PMCPMC12973099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.