Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41801204›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2026

High-Frequency Oscillation vs Mechanical Ventilation for Neonatal Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Jie Li, Kaizhen Liu, Qian Yang, Qin Tan, Zhichun Feng, Yuan Shi, Long Chen, Ling-Jun Li

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT03591796 (Selective High Frequency Oscillation Ventilation), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03591796 nacompletednot on this map

Selective High Frequency Oscillation Ventilation(HFOV) vs Conventional Mechanical Ventilation(CMV) for Neonates With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome(ARDS):an Multicenters Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorDaping Hospital and the Research Institute of Surgery of the Third Military Medical UniversityRan2024 to 2024Enrolled386ConditionsAcute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Conventional Mechanical Ventilation, High Frequency Oscillation VentilationArmsHFOV, CMV
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jie LiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Kaizhen LiuDepartment of Neonatology, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, Chongqing, China.
Qian YangBia-Echo Asia Centre for Reproductive Longevity and Equality, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Qin TanDepartment of Neonatology, Women and Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing Health Center for Women and Children, Chongqing, China.
Zhichun FengFaculty of Pediatrics, PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yuan ShiDepartment of Neonatology, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, Chongqing, China.
Long ChenDepartment of Neonatology, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, Chongqing, China.
Ling-Jun LiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Key clinical features of neonatal acute respiratory distress syndrome (NARDS) are broadly comparable to those observed in pediatric and adult ARDS; however, evidence is insufficient to recommend high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) or conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV) as the preferred first-line therapy. Objective: To evaluate whether HFOV is superior to CMV in reducing bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) and other neonatal adverse outcomes, including death, among preterm infants (≤34 weeks' gestational age) with NARDS. Design, Setting, and Participants: This single-center randomized clinical trial conducted from August 1, 2019, to December 31, 2023, enrolled preterm infants born between 25 weeks 0 days and 34 weeks 6 days of gestation with NARDS who were stabilized with CMV. Data were analyzed from October to December 2024. Intervention: Participants were randomly assigned to continue CMV or transition to elective HFOV. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was BPD, assessed using 2 definitions: definition 1, that of the 2001 Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) and definition 2, one based on 2019 research. Secondary outcomes included death, retinopathy of prematurity (higher than stage 2), necrotizing enterocolitis (stage 2 or higher), intraventricular hemorrhage (grade 3 or higher), air leak, and hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus. Modified Poisson regression, ordinal regression, and Cox proportional hazards regression were applied for outcome risk assessment where applicable. Results: A total of 386 preterm infants (230 male [59.6%]; mean [SD] maternal age, 29.9 [4.8] years) were randomized: 181 to elective HFOV and 205 to CMV. Overall, 154 (39.9%) and 83 (21.5%) developed BPD according definitions 1 and 2, respectively. Elective HFOV reduced the risk of BPD by 8.0% (34.3% vs 44.9%; relative risk, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.86-0.99) according to definition 1 and by 32.0% (17.1% vs 25.4%; relative risk 0.68; 95% CI, 0.45-1.00) according to definition 2 compared with CMV. No significant between-group differences were observed for death, higher than stage 2 retinopathy of prematurity, stage 2 or higher necrotizing enterocolitis, grade 3 or higher intraventricular hemorrhage, air leak, or hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus. Sensitivity analysis excluding 44 participants who crossed over between treatment groups did not significantly attenuate the estimates. Conclusions and Relevance: This randomized clinical trial found that elective HFOV reduced the incidence of BPD in preterm infants born at 34 weeks' gestation or earlier with NARDS compared with CMV. The results of this study suggest that elective HFOV is a promising strategy for preventing BPD in this high-risk population, especially the more severe forms linked to increased long-term morbidity and mortality. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03591796.

Indexed as

Bronchopulmonary DysplasiaHigh-Frequency VentilationRespiration, ArtificialRespiratory Distress Syndrome, NewbornFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureMale

Identifiers

PMID41801204
PMCPMC12973098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.