Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41801088›Full record

ArticleLaboratory animals2026

Beyond single metrics: Multi-parameter home-cage monitoring improves welfare assessment.

Steven R Talbot, René H Tolba, André Bleich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Laboratory animals, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Steven R TalbotHannover Medical School, Institute for Laboratory Animal Science, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9062-4065
René H TolbaRWTH Aachen University, Institute for Laboratory Animal Science and Experimental Surgery, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0383-3994
André BleichHannover Medical School, Institute for Laboratory Animal Science, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3438-0254

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single outcome measures often fall short of the sensitivity and objectivity expected under European Directive 2010/63, particularly in fast progressing disease models. To address this gap, the German Research Foundation consortium FOR2591 collated data from 55 routinely used models in six species and narrowed more than 50 candidate readouts down to a 15-parameter core panel spanning behaviour, physiology, biochemistry and imaging. Quantitative tools such as the Composite Measure Schemes, the endpointR and the Relative Severity Assessment algorithm fuse these multidimensional streams into more objective severity scores that outperform singular readouts such as body weight change and clinical scoring in detecting early distress and refine humane endpoint decisions. More than 10 external laboratories have already integrated the open-source toolbox, illustrating practical scalability. A consortium survey showed that no single metric is both widely applied and consistently valued, underscoring the need for multi-parameter monitoring. Ongoing Phase III analyses extract model specific digital fingerprints that trigger real-time risk alerts in home-cage systems. By providing a shared yet adaptable framework, FOR2591 charts a feasible path toward Directive 2010/63 compliance, improved model validity and individualized animal care, establishing a path of a more evidence-based severity assessment.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryAnimals, LaboratoryAnimal WelfareAnimals3Rsethics and welfarehome-cage monitoringlaboratory animal welfaremultiple parametersseverity assessment

Identifiers

PMID41801088
PMCPMC13219768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.