Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41800995›Full record

ArticleeLife2026

Automated genome mining predicts structural diversity and taxonomic distribution of peptide metallophores across bacteria.

Zachary L Reitz, Bita Pourmohsenin, Melanie Susman, Emil Thomsen, Daniel Roth, Alison Butler, Nadine Ziemert, Marnix H Medema

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zachary L Reitz *Bioinformatics Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1964-8221
Bita Pourmohsenin *Interfaculty Institute of Microbiology and Infection Medicine, Institute for Bioinformatics and Medical Informatics, Tübingen, Germany.
Melanie SusmanDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, United States.
Emil ThomsenDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, United States.
Daniel RothDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, United States.
Alison ButlerDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3525-7864
Nadine ZiemertInterfaculty Institute of Microbiology and Infection Medicine, Institute for Bioinformatics and Medical Informatics, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7264-1857
Marnix H MedemaBioinformatics Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2191-2821

Funding

Deutsches Zentrum für Infektionsforschung TTU09.716European Research Council 948770-DECIPHERHORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme H2020-FNR-11-2020National Science Foundation CHE-2108596
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial competition for trace metals shapes their communities and interactions with humans and plants. Many bacteria scavenge trace metals with metallophores, small molecules that chelate environmental metal ions. Metallophore production may be predicted by genome mining, where genomes are scanned for homologs of known biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs). However, accurately detecting non-ribosomal peptide (NRP) metallophore biosynthesis requires expert manual inspection, stymieing large-scale investigations. Here, we introduce automated identification of NRP metallophore BGCs through a comprehensive algorithm, implemented in antiSMASH, that detects chelator biosynthesis genes with 97% precision and 78% recall against manual curation. We showcase the utility of the detection algorithm by experimentally characterizing metallophores from several taxa. High-throughput NRP metallophore BGC detection enabled metallophore detection across 69,929 genomes spanning the bacterial kingdom. We predict that 25% of all bacterial non-ribosomal peptide synthetases encode metallophore production and that significant chemical diversity remains undiscovered. A reconstructed evolutionary history of NRP metallophores supports that some chelating groups may predate the Great Oxygenation Event. The inclusion of NRP metallophore detection in antiSMASH will aid non-expert researchers and continue to facilitate large-scale investigations into metallophore biology.

Indexed as

BacteriaGenome, BacterialMetalsPeptidesAlgorithmsData MiningMultigene FamilyPeptide SynthasesMetalsPeptidesPeptide Synthasesbiosynthetic gene clustercomputational biologygenome mininginfectious diseasemetallophoremicrobiologysystems biology

Identifiers

PMID41800995
PMCPMC12971057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.