Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41800804›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical imaging and radiation oncology2026

Utility of SUVmax on Primary Staging 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in Determining Metastatic Status of Prostate Cancer.

Geoffrey Liu, Shane Lee, Kabir Ahmad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Geoffrey LiuBarwon Medical Imaging, Barwon Health, Geelong, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2314-427X
Shane LeeBarwon Medical Imaging, Barwon Health, Geelong, Australia.
Kabir AhmadBarwon Medical Imaging, Barwon Health, Geelong, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction68Ga prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) has been shown to have prognostic value in detecting PSMA expressing metastasis from prostate cancer, but inevitably, there are cases in which suspected metastases demonstrate equivocal uptake. This study aims to assess whether there is a direct relationship between SUVmax of the primary prostate lesion and the presence of nodal and distant metastasis.

methodsRetrospective review of 265 primary staging 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT studies performed at a single centre on a single PET/CT was performed for the SUVmax of the primary lesion, and the presence of PSMA-avid nodal/distant metastases.

resultsAnalysis shows that a single unit increase in SUVmax of the primary prostatic lesion corresponds with a 1.6% increased odds of nodal metastases, 1.7% increased odds of distant metastases and a 2% increased odds of having either. A single unit increase in the log of the SUVmax corresponds with odds ratios of 2.061, 2.038 and 2.294 respectively.

conclusionThere is a weak but statistically significant correlation between the SUVmax of the primary prostate lesion and the presence of metastases on primary staging 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for biopsy-proven prostate cancer. However, because the relationship is so weak and the significant overlap in SUVmax in local versus advanced disease, using SUVmax as the sole predictor of advanced disease is unreliable.

Indexed as

Edetic AcidOligopeptidesPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyProstatic NeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overGallium IsotopesGallium RadioisotopesHumansLymphatic MetastasisMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm StagingRadiopharmaceuticalsRetrospective StudiesEdetic Acidgallium 68 PSMA-11Gallium IsotopesGallium RadioisotopesOligopeptidesRadiopharmaceuticalsmetastasisprostate cancerPSMA PETstagingSUVmax

Identifiers

PMID41800804
PMCPMC13472021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.