ArticleThoracic research and practice2026
Use of Impulse Oscillometry in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
Article in Thoracic research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveAlthough spirometry is a standard diagnostic tool for obstructive lung diseases, it is rarely performed, and the quality of basic spirometry is low in many countries. The impulse oscillometry system (IOS) is a non-invasive method that requires minimal patient cooperation and, therefore, can be performed even in the pediatric population. It has been also suggested that IOS may help to clarify the relationship between small airway disease and the underlying mechanisms of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The primary objective of the study was to compare IOS parameters in COPD patients with those in healthy individuals. Our secondary objective was to determine the relationship between IOS parameters and standard pulmonary function tests (PFTs). Our hypothesis was that airway resistance detected by IOS would be higher in COPD patients than in controls. Hence, IOS would provide findings comparable to and correlated with those of standardized PFTs for small airway obstruction. MATERIAL AND
methodsA total of 104 subjects (62 patients with COPD and 42 healthy non-smoking individuals) were included in the study. All subjects underwent spirometry, diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO), lung-volume measurements, and IOS.
resultsCOPD patients showed significant decreases in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV
conclusionThis study showed that airway resistance was increased in the COPD group and that IOS parameters were associated with measures of small-airway function in standard PFTs. IOS can be used as a non-invasive, patient-friendly method that complements PFTs by providing a comprehensive assessment of COPD pathology and pathophysiological changes and detecting changes in symptomatic patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.