ArticleClinical linguistics & phonetics2026
Deep learning-derived measures of sound-level accuracy in primary progressive apraxia of speech: A feasibility pipeline with descriptive evidence from two cases.
Article in Clinical linguistics & phonetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluating Goodness of Pronunciation and Phonological Posteriors as Objective Markers of Speech Severity in Motor Speech Disorders.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Primary Progressive Apraxia of Speech (PPAOS) is a neurodegenerative motor speech disorder marked by disrupted speech planning and programming. This study demonstrates the implementation and interpretability of phonological-class-based posterior probability values generated by Phonet (a deep learning model) in two individuals with PPAOS (one phonetic, one prosodic predominant), across different speech rates and delayed auditory feedback (DAF) settings. Phonet generated frame-level posterior probabilities for phonological classes, which were aggregated and aligned with segment durations. The prosodic subtype showed higher, more stable articulatory values and improvements under DAF, while the phonetic subtype showed greater variability and sensitivity to condition changes. Results were consistent with expert articulatory judgements of sound errors. These findings demonstrate Phonet's potential to provide interpretable, segment-level measures of articulatory performance and suggest its utility in monitoring treatment-related articulatory changes in motor speech disorders. Further research is needed to assess its broader clinical applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.