ArticleNoise & health
Sound Distraction and Mental Health in the Workplace: The Role of Coping Strategies.
Article in Noise & health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveGuided by Person-Environment Fit theory, this study examines how perceived sound distraction and disturbance, coping strategies and personal characteristics relate to mental health outcomes in office environments. MATERIALS AND
methodsData were collected from two organisations (N = 214). Structural equation modelling was used to analyse the complex relationships between sound distraction, coping strategies, personal characteristics and a broad set of mental health outcomes.
resultsThe measurement model confirmed that three items loaded onto each mental health factor, which were strongly interrelated. Stressful mood was significantly associated with exhaustion (β = 0.57, t = 6.64) and fatigue (β = 0.21, t = 4.86) and also correlated with poor sleep quality (β = -0.59, t = -4.42) and disengagement (β = -0.34, t = -2.88). Employees reporting low concentration and poor sleep tended to feel more disengaged. Perceived distraction was negatively related to concentration (β = -0.67, t = -5.38). Disturbance from unintelligible background sounds was linked to higher exhaustion (β = 0.10, t = -2.99), whereas disturbance from intelligible speech showed an inverse relationship with exhaustion (β = -0.11, t = -2.63). Both disturbance types were strongly correlated and associated with increased distraction. Coping strategies were predominantly avoidance-based; notably, working more slowly than usual was associated with disturbance from speech (β = 0.18, t = 3.17), while trying to be quieter was linked to disturbance from unintelligible sounds (β = 0.28, t = 3.44). Greater effort was paradoxically related to higher fatigue (β = 0.24, t = 2.41) but lower disengagement (β = -0.098, t = -2.46). Noise-sensitive employees reported higher stressful mood (β = 0.19, t = 3.62) and were more likely to adopt avoidance coping strategies (β = 0.42, t = 6.88). The lack of concentration spaces and frequent individual-focused tasks amplified the distraction and disturbance.
conclusionThe findings highlight the complex interplay among sound, coping and mental health. Organisations should reduce chronic noise stressors and, based on theory and prior research, encourage approach-oriented coping to mitigate long-term risks. Providing acoustically optimised spaces and interventions such as sound masking can improve person-environment fit and support employee well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.