ReviewNoise & health
Integrated Effects of Environmental and Classroom Noise on Attention and Learning in School-age Children.
Review in Noise & health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis review investigated the effects of external and classroom noise on school-aged children's cognitive performance. The analysis identified exposure patterns across studies; quantified effects on attention, memory, and reading processes; and developed a conceptual model connecting acoustic input, processing effort, and academic performance.
methodsA structured search was conducted to identify observational and experimental studies on noise exposure and cognitive outcomes in school environments. Eligible studies quantified noise using the equivalent continuous sound level, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and reverberation time (RT) and included outcomes in attention, memory, and reading tasks. Data were mapped across environmental noise and classroom acoustic conditions.
resultsClassroom exposure levels commonly ranged between 65 and 77 dB(A), and external exposure from aircraft and road-traffic sources often exceeded 60 dB(A) during teaching periods. Lower SNRs and longer RTs reduced speech clarity and increased the processing effort needed to follow spoken information across the study design. Performance decreased in tasks involving attention, verbal memory, and reading accuracy. Children from lower socioeconomic backgrounds, bilingual learners, and pupils with weaker attention control exhibited larger performance reductions under identical acoustic conditions. Integrating these results produced a conceptual model in which external noise at school entry and classroom noise during instruction form a continuous exposure sequence that increases processing effort and reduces the learning capacity.
conclusionsNoise affects children by increasing processing load and reducing the cognitive resources available for learning. The model outlines this mechanism. The findings indicate acoustic improvements in classrooms and systematic noise monitoring in school environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.