ArticleDrug and alcohol review2026
SMART Family and Friends Mutual-Help Groups: Findings From a Mixed-Methods Formative Implementation Evaluation.
Article in Drug and alcohol review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionImproving support for people affected by another's substance use disorder (affected family members [AFM]) is a priority, but implementation is challenging. This mixed-methods evaluation assessed the perceived effectiveness of SMART Family and Friends training and applied the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to examine program implementation.
methodsN = 24 participants with professional or lived experience of supporting AFMs were recruited and trained to deliver groups. Training was evaluated using the Work Practice Questionnaire. Semi-structured interviews (n = 19) captured experiences of training and group delivery. Transcripts were analysed using iterative categorisation, informed by CFIR domains.
resultsParticipants felt equipped to deliver groups (M = 20.79, SD = 3.09) and found the training useful (M = 28.40, SD = 2.74) and relevant (M = 27.16, SD = 2.85). The approach, applicability and structure of the intervention (intervention characteristics) promoted engagement. Workplace characteristics influenced time and resources available to support implementation, with adequate staffing paramount (inner setting). Participants identified a clear need for the program, but practical and attitudinal barriers complicated engagement (outer setting). Lived experience promoted facilitator engagement and also raised wellbeing and training considerations (individual characteristics). Challenges associated with delivery modality and experiences facilitating groups (implementation process) were identified. DISCUSSION AND
conclusionsSMART Family and Friends has potential for scaled implementation by peers and providers within voluntary positions and those employed within existing AOD and community service programs, although service limitations and barriers around help-seeking may hinder delivery. Efforts to address training and infrastructure considerations, particularly among those with lived experience, are needed. Improved understanding of the support needs and preferences of AFMs is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.