ArticleDrug and alcohol review2026
Trends in Opioid Agonist Treatment for Opioid Dependence During Pregnancy: A Population-Based Study in New South Wales 2005-2021.
Article in Drug and alcohol review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Retention in opioid agonist treatment during pregnancy and variations according to treatment and maternal characteristics.Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2026Article
- Postpartum retention in opioid agonist treatment for opioid dependence: A population-based cohort study.Archives of women's mental health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe objective of this study was to examine trends in opioid agonist treatment (OAT) during pregnancy for opioid dependence, by OAT type (methadone, buprenorphine) and during-pregnancy OAT type change.
methodsData linkage study. The cohort included pregnancies resulting in childbirth among people who received OAT within 4 years prior to birth, New South Wales, 1 January 2005-31 December 2021. We calculated the prevalence of OAT during pregnancy by OAT type and year of birth; prevalence rate ratios (PRR) and proportions experiencing OAT type change during pregnancy.
resultsThe cohort included 5212 childbirths among 3303 people. OAT was received in 4102 (78.7%) pregnancies. The annual prevalence of OAT during pregnancy was 77.2% in 2005, 86.2% in 2012 and 63.2% in 2021 (PRR 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.99-1.00). Between 2005 and 2021, methadone use during pregnancy decreased from 70.9% to 37.4% (PRR 0.97; 95% CI 0.96-0.98) while buprenorphine use increased from 12.3% to 29.3% (PRR 1.07; 95% CI 1.06-1.08). Overall, changes in OAT type occurred in 226 pregnancies (5.5%). Among 971 pregnancies initially on buprenorphine, methadone was later used among 193, with this proportion decreasing over time. Of the 3131 pregnancies initially on methadone, buprenorphine was later used among only 33. DISCUSSION AND
conclusionsThree in four people in the cohort received OAT during pregnancy, with no statistically significant change in annual prevalence over the 2005-2021 period. Given prior evidence indicating higher rates of treatment discontinuation with buprenorphine versus methadone, the increased buprenorphine use during pregnancy highlights the need for targeted strategies to support treatment retention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.