ReviewThe Canadian journal of urology2026
Unusual metastatic patterns of urologic malignancies: a case series and literature review.
Review in The Canadian journal of urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUrologic cancers typically metastasize to common organs, while spread to sites such as the heart, hand, cranial bones, penis, or tonsil is exceedingly rare. The clinical relevance and prognostic impact of these unusual metastases remain unclear. This case series highlights six exceptional cases, providing unique insights to support awareness and management. CASE DESCRIPTION: We retrospectively analyzed six cases of patients diagnosed with urologic cancers who developed metastases at uncommon sites. Each case was evaluated based on clinical presentation, imaging findings, histopathological confirmation, treatment course, and outcomes. Relevant literature was reviewed to contextualize findings. Among the six cases, metastatic involvement was identified in atypical locations including the right atrium (testicular cancer), hand (bladder cancer), perineum and penis (sarcomatoid bladder cancer), cranial bones (prostate cancer), penis (rectal cancer), and tonsillar region (renal pelvis rhabdomyosarcoma). Timely imaging and histopathological confirmation guided personalized treatment strategies, primarily involving surgical interventions. Despite aggressive treatments, the prognosis remained poor in most cases, reflecting the aggressive nature of these metastases.
conclusionRare metastases from urologic malignancies, although uncommon, have significant implications on patient management. Early detection through advanced imaging and aggressive multimodal interventions are pivotal for improving outcomes. Awareness of such atypical metastatic patterns is essential for clinicians managing urologic cancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41800517What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.