ArticleThe Canadian journal of urology2026
PSMA PET/CT-guided pelvic lymph node dissection in patients with unfavorable intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer.
Article in The Canadian journal of urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesPSMA PET/CT (Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography) offers improved accuracy in detecting lymph node invasion (LNI) in prostate cancer (PC) patients, potentially reducing the need for extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND). This study aims to evaluate a patient-tailored care pathway in which ePLND is performed only in patients with unfavorable intermediate- or high-risk PC who are deemed at risk for LNI based on PSMA PET/CT findings.
methodsIn this interventional cohort study, 81 patients were managed according to the new care pathway. ePLND was omitted in cases of negative PSMA PET/CT findings (N0M0), while those with positive PSMA PET/CT findings (N1M0) underwent ePLND. A comparator group of 81 patients was selected from a prospectively generated database for comparison.
resultsThe intervention group experienced a 75% reduction in the number of ePLNDs performed compared to the comparator group (p < 0.001). ePLND-related complications were significantly lower in the intervention group (p = 0.008). No significant difference was observed in 3-year biochemical-recurrence free survival (BRFS) between the two groups (p = 0.958).
conclusionOmitting ePLND in patients with negative PSMA PET/CT findings (N0M0) leads to a substantial reduction in the number of ePLNDs performed, resulting in a decrease in morbidity, without compromising early oncological outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41800504What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.