Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41800483›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2026

Predicting Individual Risk of Advanced Adenoma Based on the Interval-Censored Recurrent Adenoma Event and Informative Screening Time.

Yipeng Wei, May AlHusseini, Hormuzd A Katki, Rajeshwari Sundaram, Qing Pan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yipeng WeiDepartment of Statistics, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9038-4332
May AlHusseiniDepartment of Statistics, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
Hormuzd A KatkiCenter for Early Cancer Detection, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Rajeshwari SundaramDivision of Population Health Research, Division of Intramural Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6918-5002
Qing PanDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Milken School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.

Funding

Statistical Methods for Analyzing Repeated Measures DataZIAHD008877 · NICHD · EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT · PI ALBERT, PAUL · 2009 to 2016
$1.3M
Semiparametric inference of survival dataZ01HD008856 · NICHD · EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT · PI SUNDARAM, RAJESHWARI · 2008 to 2008
$109k
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 HD008856Intramural NIH HHS ZIA HD008877
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Panel count data is common in cancer screening. In the context of colorectal cancer screening, our work focuses on the prediction of the probability of advanced adenoma conditional on patient-level risk factors and/or event history. We implement the joint frailty model proposed by Huang et al. which involves a non-stationary Poisson process for recurrent adenoma events and informative screening time using semi-parametric Cox models correlated by a latent frailty variable, where coefficients and baseline intensity functions are estimated by estimating equations. Subject-specific frailty value is estimated by the borrow-strength method. In addition, marginal models for the adenoma and screening events are also applicable when average covariate effects on the population level are of interest. Predictions based on the marginal model and predictions based on the frailty models for patients with or without a screening history are compared. When a patient's screening history is available and sufficient adenoma events are observed, the predictions based on the frailty model with estimated subject-specific frailty are superior. However, in the cases of early censoring when adenoma events are not observed for most patients and screening history is not available, the prediction based on the marginal model has better performance. Furthermore, for patients' future screening, the individualized screening intervals derived from the dynamic predictions of advanced adenoma risks will detect adenoma events earlier with shorter lag time between the adenoma state transition and the screening compared to the current practice of regular screening intervals.

Indexed as

AdenomaColorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerModels, StatisticalFemaleHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProportional Hazards ModelsRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTime Factorsestimating equationsfrailty modelinterval‐censoredmarginal modelrecurrent eventsrisk prediction

Identifiers

PMID41800483
PMCPMC13138255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.