ArticleJournal of pain research2026
The Efficacy and Safety of Crisugabalin (HSK16149) in Fibromyalgia Patients: Protocol for a Prospective Randomized Open Blinded-Endpoint (PROBE) Study.
Article in Journal of pain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07196657 (Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Pregabalin Monotherapy Versus Other Neuromodulatory Drugs), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Pregabalin Monotherapy Versus Other Neuromodulatory Drugs (Crisugabalin) in the Treatment of Fibromyalgia: A Multicenter Clinical Study
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Fibromyalgia (FM) is a chronic condition, imposing a substantial burden on patients. Pregabalin, a first-line treatment, offers incomplete efficacy for many and is associated with dose-limiting central nervous system adverse effects. Crisugabalin is a novel α2δ ligand with 23-fold higher binding affinity than pregabalin and has shown potentially fewer central nervous system adverse effects in animal models. While crisugabalin has shown efficacy in other neuropathic pain conditions, its efficacy in FM, particularly in a direct comparison with pregabalin, remains unclear. Methods and Analysis: This multicenter, prospective, randomized, pregabalin-controlled, open-label, blinded-endpoint study will be conducted at 10 hospitals in China. A total of 1116 adult patients with FM and a baseline average daily pain intensity of ≥4 on an 11-point numerical rating scale will be enrolled. Participants will be randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either crisugabalin or pregabalin for 12 weeks using a standardized, flexible-titration protocol. While participants and treating physicians will be aware of the treatment allocation, outcome assessors and data analysts will remain blinded. The primary outcome is the proportion of patients achieving at least a 50% reduction in average pain intensity from baseline at week 12. Secondary outcomes include pain intensity measures, study drug dosing and rescue analgesic utilization, Revised FM Impact Questionnaire, Brief Pain Inventory severity and interfere subscales, short-form 36 Health Survey, Patient Global Impression of Change Scale, Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale, Beck Depression Inventory-II, and incidence of adverse events. Analyses will be performed on the modified intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations. Ethics and Dissemination: This study, approved by the Institutional Review Board of Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University (KY2025-217-03), will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants, and findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and scientific conferences. Trial Registration: Clinical Trials.gov identifier: NCT07196657. Registered on September 29, 2025 (https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/search?term=NCT07196657).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.