ArticlePerspectives on medical education2026
"I've Never Really Thought about This…" - The Complexity of Patient Involvement in Education from the Teachers' Point of View.
Article in Perspectives on medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Patient involvement in health professions education (HPE) often takes the form of isolated, small-scale activities, where teachers' initiatives largely determine whether and how patients are included. Understanding how teachers make sense of patient involvement is therefore crucial for strengthening and sustaining this practice in HPE. Using a phenomenographic approach, our aim was to explore how teachers understand patient involvement in HPE and visualize these interrelated understandings in an outcome space. Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 20 teachers experienced in working with patient involvement across eight different HPE programs at one university. The interview guide was developed within the research group, in dialogue with a patient representative. Results: We identified four qualitatively different ways in which teachers understand patient involvement: as a way to 1) create variation in education, 2) improve education, 3) improve health care or 4) improve society. These four categories were comprised of seven themes of expanding awareness: the role of the patient, the role of the student, the role of the teacher, role of education, interaction between patient and student, view of workplace learning and teachers' perceived agency. Discussion and conclusion: Our findings suggest that there is considerable complexity in how teachers understand the purpose and value of patient involvement in education. These differences will influence why, how, and to what extent patients are involved in HPE. Striving towards a more complex understanding may support more beneficial, sustainable and meaningful patient involvement. Further research should explore how different stakeholders' understandings influence the practice of patient involvement in HPE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.