ArticleBioinformatics advances2026
Benchmarking methods for genome annotation using nanopore direct RNA in a non-model crop plant.
Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Motivation: High-quality genome annotations are essential for transcriptomic analyses investigating plant responses to environmental stress. While nanopore long-read direct RNA sequencing offers a powerful approach for improving genome annotations, studies benchmarking optimal tools for this process have primarily focused on animal models. In this study, we benchmarked five annotation tools: StringTie3, IsoQuant, Bambu, FLAIR, and FLAMES, using direct RNA data from barley infected with Net Form Net Blotch disease. Results: We observed substantial variation across tools in isoform detection, structural completeness, splicing classification, and handling of 5' read truncation. Several tools successfully identified novel transcripts, with the two top-performing reference-guided approaches both detecting over 700 previously unannotated transcripts, including candidates with predicted roles in disease response. Our results highlight the importance of plant-specific benchmarking of bioinformatic tools and demonstrate the utility of direct RNA sequencing for improving genome annotations, supporting ongoing efforts to enhance reference resources for non-model plant species. Availability and implementation: Benchmarking code is available at https://github.com/jadedavis5/benchmarking_paper. Datasets are described in the 'Data availability' section.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.