ArticleBioinformatics advances2026
Protein abundance inference via expectation-maximization in fluorosequencing.
Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Summary: Fluorosequencing generates millions of single peptide reads, yet a principled route to quantitative protein abundances has been lacking. We present a probabilistic framework that adapts expectation-maximization (EM) to the fluorosequencing measurement process, using posterior peptide probabilities from existing classifiers to estimate relative protein abundances. The algorithm iteratively updates abundances to maximize the likelihood of observed reads. We first evaluate five-protein simulations with realistic labeling and system errors. A simple Python implementation processes one million reads in under ten seconds on a standard workstation and reduces the mean absolute error by over an order of magnitude relative to a uniform-abundance guess, indicating robust performance in small-scale settings. We also assess scalability with full human-proteome simulations (20 642 proteins). Ten million reads are processed in under four hours on an NVIDIA DGX with a single Tesla V100 GPU, confirming tractability at proteome scale. Under current fluorosequencing error rates, the method yields modest accuracy gains, but when error rates are reduced, estimation error drops markedly, indicating that chemistry improvements would translate directly into more accurate quantitative proteomics. Overall, EM-based inference provides a scalable, model-driven bridge from peptide-level classification to protein-level quantification in fluorosequencing. Furthermore, the framework can also serve as a refinement step within other inference methods. Availability and implementation: The code and data utilized to produce all the results of this paper is at https://github.com/JavierKipen/ProtInfGPU.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.