Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41800372›Full record

ArticleActa gastroenterologica Latinoamericana

[Use of Los Angeles Classification in Erosive Esophagitis: analysis of inter-observer and intra-observer agreement].

Anahí Ayelén de Los Rios, Juan Ignacio Olmos, José María Sanguinetti, Andrés Wonaga, Lorena Bortot, Esteban González Ballerga

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Acta gastroenterologica Latinoamericana. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anahí Ayelén de Los RiosHospital de Clínicas José de San Martín. Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina. Hospital de Clínicas José de San Martín Hospital de Clínicas José de San Martín Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9765-4181
Juan Ignacio OlmosHospital de Clínicas José de San Martín. Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina. Hospital de Clínicas José de San Martín Hospital de Clínicas José de San Martín Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8705-4233
José María SanguinettiHospital de Clínicas José de San Martín. Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina. Hospital de Clínicas José de San Martín Hospital de Clínicas José de San Martín Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6043-7218
Andrés WonagaHospital de Clínicas José de San Martín. Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina. Hospital de Clínicas José de San Martín Hospital de Clínicas José de San Martín Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5317-3034
Lorena BortotHospital de Clínicas José de San Martín. Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina. Hospital de Clínicas José de San Martín Hospital de Clínicas José de San Martín Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9125-1371
Esteban González BallergaHospital de Clínicas José de San Martín. Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina. Hospital de Clínicas José de San Martín Hospital de Clínicas José de San Martín Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8066-2244

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Gastroesophageal reflux disease is a com-mon condition with a prevalence of 10 to 20% in Western countries. The Los Angeles Classification is the standard endoscopic system for categorizing erosive esophagitis. Objectives: To evaluate intra- and inter-observer agreement among resident physicians and gastroenterology specialists in classifying the severity of reflux-related erosive esopha-gitis using the Los Angeles Classification. Materials and methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 59 participants (25 specialists and 34 residents) who clas-sified 40 endoscopic images according to the Los Angeles Classification (10 images were duplicated). Inter-observ-er agreement was analyzed using Fleiss's kappa index and intra-observer agreement using Cohen's kappa. Results: Inter-observer agreement was moderate among specialists (κ = 0.425, IC95% 0.39 - 0.46) and acceptable among residents (κ = 0.297, IC95% 0.26-0.33), and the dif-ference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Over-all intra-observer agreement was moderate (κ = 0.525, IC95% 0.47 - 0.58). Conclusion: Low inter- and intra-observer agreement was observed when using the Los Angeles Classification for esophagitis, with signifi-cant differences when comparing groups with different levels of experience. The development and application of local clinical-endoscopic protocols is recommended to standardize diagnostic and therapeutic criteria, optimize resources, and contribute to the training of gastroenter-ology specialists.

Indexed as

erosive esophagitisGastroesophageal reflux diseaseinter-observer and intra-observer agreementLos Angeles Classificationobserver variabilityupper gastrointestinal endoscopy

Identifiers

PMID41800372
PMCPMC12965164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.