ArticleFrontiers in oral health2026
Using psychometric and focus groups methods to assess patients' attitudes regarding the role of dental providers and vaccinations for COVID-19 and HPV.
Article in Frontiers in oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objectives: To develop a initial validated survey for assessment of patient perceptions around dental provider role in HPV and COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: Using a parallel convergent mixed methods design, this study reports the initial validation of a survey through the integration of psychometric and focus group methods and presents findings of patient perceptions of dentist involvement in vaccine efforts through a focus group in Philadelphia, PA. Results: A previously tested pilot survey was modified based on the integrated results. The final survey was organized according to factor analysis and reflected the focus group recommendations. The changes reduced the survey by 25% from 22 to 16 questions. Two overarching themes to better understand perceptions of dentist involvement in vaccine efforts identified from the focus group were: 1. attitudes related to appropriateness and acceptability of dental providers educating and administering vaccinations; and 2. how lack of knowledge hindered intentions to seek vaccination from dental providers. Conclusion: The combination of the psychometric and focus group analyses resulted in a final survey to assess patient's attitudes and acceptance of HPV and COVID-19 vaccination, including vaccination status, knowledge about the impacts of HPV and COVID-19, perceptions of dental care providers' role, and comfort in having a dental provider administer HPV and COVID-19 vaccines. Practice and policy implications: This initial validity process of the survey from creates an opportunity to assess patient acceptance of dentist roles in vaccine efforts around HPV and COVID-19. Further validation of the final form is pending.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.