Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41800344›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2026

Feasibility of 3D vascular reconstruction for preoperative planning in robotic living donor nephrectomy: a retrospective pilot study.

Mohamed El-Mahrouk, Beatrice Lukenaite, Todor Stoyanov, Antonia Geisler, Andri Lederer, Robert Karitnig, Robert Sucher, Saulius Mikalauskas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mohamed El-MahroukDivision of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Beatrice LukenaiteDivision of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Todor StoyanovDivision of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Antonia GeislerDivision of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Andri LedererDivision of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Robert KaritnigDivision of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Robert SucherDivision of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Saulius MikalauskasDivision of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Patient safety is crucial in donor nephrectomy. Individualized 3D reconstructions from CT imaging are gaining popularity for improving preoperative planning. This study evaluates whether such models enhance anatomical assessment and surgical preparation in robotic live donor nephrectomy. Methods: This retrospective pilot study included 24 patients who underwent robotic live donor nephrectomy between 2022 and 2025. 3D models were reconstructed by the surgeon using MED EINS software and compared to conventional CT reports regarding vascular anatomy. Results: Of the 24 nephrectomies, 75% were left-sided. No intraoperative complications occurred; minor postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo I/II) were observed in 16.7% of cases. Donors had a mean age of 52.9 years and a mean BMI of 28.0. Most had a single renal artery (83.3%) and vein (91.7%). The mean operative time was 205 min, and hospital stay averaged 6.4 days. Donors were often parents or partners (each 41.7%). 3D reconstructions showed high concordance with CT reports. In one case, a second artery was missed on the CT report but visible on the 3D model, demonstrating its utility for detecting anatomical variants. Conclusion: 3D reconstructions have the potential to support and refine preoperative planning in robotic donor nephrectomy by enhancing anatomical visualization. However, their clinical benefit should be further validated in prospective studies.

Indexed as

3D reconstructionlive donor nephrectomyrobotic surgerysurgical planningtransplantation

Identifiers

PMID41800344
PMCPMC12960146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.