ArticleGE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology
The Vanishing Colorectal Tumor: Lessons from an Illustrative Case Report.
Article in GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Colorectal cancer is the most frequent digestive neoplasia and is usually diagnosed by colonoscopy. Treatment is contingent on staging and other factors and generally includes a combination of endoscopic or surgical resection, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Case Presentation: A 64-year-old female patient was diagnosed with an adenocarcinoma of the ascending colon following a colonoscopy performed due to anemia. After histological confirmation and staging, she was submitted to a right hemicolectomy. However, the neoplasia was not present in the surgical specimen and follow-up colonoscopy did not find any lesion in the remaining colon. Histopathological and endoscopic results were reappraised and the endoscopic list of the day of the index colonoscopy was reviewed with no potential error to be found. Finally, genetic concordance of the index biopsies and surgical specimen was confirmed. Discussion: Spontaneous regression of neoplasia is very rare, particularly in colorectal cancer. The mechanisms of this phenomenon are not well understood and are probably multifactorial. When the possibility of spontaneous regression is being considered, a very rigorous approach must be followed as errors, such as misidentification, are more likely. In this exemplary case, we describe the steps taken to reach this surprising diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.