Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41800280›Full record

ReviewEuropean heart journal open2026

Intravascular imaging in peripheral arterial disease: a contemporary literature review.

Jason Galo, Abdullah Al-Qaraghuli, Ryan Wallace, Aninka Saboe, Julianna Morera, Pablo Rubio, Abhishek Chaturvedi, Beni Verma, Kalyan R Chitturi, Ron Waksman and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European heart journal open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jason GaloSection of Interventional Cardiology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, 110 Irving street, NW, Washington, DC 20010, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9036-7049
Abdullah Al-QaraghuliDepartment of Internal Medicine, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, 110 Irving street, NW, Washington, DC 20010, USA.
Ryan WallaceDepartment of Cardiology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, 110 Irving street, NW, Washington, DC 20010, USA.
Aninka SaboeSection of Interventional Cardiology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, 110 Irving street, NW, Washington, DC 20010, USA.
Julianna MoreraCollege of Arts and Sciences, University of Miami, 1252 Memorial Dr, Coral Gables, Miami, FL 33146, USA.
Pablo RubioSection of Interventional Cardiology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, 110 Irving street, NW, Washington, DC 20010, USA.
Abhishek ChaturvediSection of Interventional Cardiology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, 110 Irving street, NW, Washington, DC 20010, USA.
Beni VermaSection of Interventional Cardiology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, 110 Irving street, NW, Washington, DC 20010, USA.
Kalyan R ChitturiSection of Interventional Cardiology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, 110 Irving street, NW, Washington, DC 20010, USA.
Ron WaksmanSection of Interventional Cardiology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, 110 Irving street, NW, Washington, DC 20010, USA.
Hector M Garcia-GarciaSection of Interventional Cardiology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, 110 Irving street, NW, Washington, DC 20010, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5100-0471

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography are advanced intravascular imaging modalities that provide detailed vessel assessment and have shown potential to optimize peripheral arterial disease interventions. While angiography remains the standard guidance tool during peripheral endovascular procedures, intravascular imaging offers superior visualization of lesion characteristics and vessel dimensions. This scoping review of the literature, conducted using MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception to 21 September 2025 and reported according to PRISMA-ScR recommendations, evaluates the technology, principles, and clinical applications of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) in peripheral interventions. Compared with angiography alone, both modalities aid in lesion preparation, improve stent implantation, reduce procedural complications, and are associated with improved vessel patency and lower reintervention rates. Optical coherence tomography, owing to its higher resolution, is particularly useful for detailed lesion morphology assessment and identification of neointimal hyperplasia in in-stent restenosis, although its use is limited by reduced penetration depth, field of view, contrast requirements, and the need for blood clearance. Overall, IVUS and OCT facilitate precise vessel characterization and improved procedural outcomes in peripheral arterial disease, though further high-quality randomized studies are needed to define optimal indications and cost-effectiveness.

Indexed as

Balloon angioplastyIntravascular ultrasoundOptical coherence tomographyPeripheral arterial diseasePeripheral endovascular interventionStenting

Identifiers

PMID41800280
PMCPMC12967067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.