ReviewEuropean heart journal open2026
Intravascular imaging in peripheral arterial disease: a contemporary literature review.
Review in European heart journal open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From intravascular imaging to adaptive vascular care: intelligent photonics and digital twins in panvascular disease.Light, science & applications · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography are advanced intravascular imaging modalities that provide detailed vessel assessment and have shown potential to optimize peripheral arterial disease interventions. While angiography remains the standard guidance tool during peripheral endovascular procedures, intravascular imaging offers superior visualization of lesion characteristics and vessel dimensions. This scoping review of the literature, conducted using MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception to 21 September 2025 and reported according to PRISMA-ScR recommendations, evaluates the technology, principles, and clinical applications of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) in peripheral interventions. Compared with angiography alone, both modalities aid in lesion preparation, improve stent implantation, reduce procedural complications, and are associated with improved vessel patency and lower reintervention rates. Optical coherence tomography, owing to its higher resolution, is particularly useful for detailed lesion morphology assessment and identification of neointimal hyperplasia in in-stent restenosis, although its use is limited by reduced penetration depth, field of view, contrast requirements, and the need for blood clearance. Overall, IVUS and OCT facilitate precise vessel characterization and improved procedural outcomes in peripheral arterial disease, though further high-quality randomized studies are needed to define optimal indications and cost-effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.