ArticleJournal of orthopaedic translation2026
A scaffold-free cartilage construct fabricated using a bio 3D printer accelerates critical-size bone defect regeneration.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic translation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Black phosphorus/calcium silicate-functionalized 3D hierarchical scaffolds: Coupling photothermal therapy with ion microenvironment-induced mineralization for bone repair.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Challenges and opportunities in generating microvasculature using bioprinting techniques.npj biomedical innovations · 2026Review
- Integrating mechanistic research and emerging technologies to advance clinical translation in orthopaedics.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Critical-size bone defects (CSD), often resulting from trauma or tumour resection, represent a challenging clinical condition that is difficult to treat. Although autologous bone grafting is a common treatment, limitations such as donor site morbidity necessitate the development of novel therapeutic strategies. Approaches that mimic endochondral ossification, the natural process of bone development and healing, are increasingly recognised for their bone regenerative potential. The combination of mesenchymal stem cells and scaffolds, used in many bone regeneration studies, has drawbacks, such as scaffold-derived complications including chronic inflammation and fibrosis. To overcome these issues, we used a bio-three-dimensional (3D) printer that enables the fabrication of scaffold-free 3D cellular constructs. This study aimed to establish a novel therapeutic strategy for CSD by generating scaffold-free cartilage constructs from rat adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (rAT-MSCs) and evaluating their regenerative potential. Materials and methods: Scaffold-free cellular constructs were fabricated using rAT-MSCs. Cartilage constructs were generated by chondrogenic induction. A 5-mm CSD was created in the diaphysis of the rat femur. Three experimental groups were established: a Defect group (n = 9), in which no material was implanted into the defect; an MSC group (n = 9), in which undifferentiated constructs were implanted into the defect; and an MSC-Ch (AT-MSC-derived chondrocyte) group (n = 9), in which cartilage constructs were implanted into the defect. Computed tomography (CT) and histological analyses were performed at 6 and 12 weeks post-implantation. Results: CT scans showed significantly higher bone volume/total volume ratios in the MSC-Ch group than in the Defect and MSC groups at 6 and 12 weeks ( Conclusion: Implantation of scaffold-free cartilage constructs derived from rAT-MSCs effectively promoted CSD healing. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to successfully regenerate a long bone CSD using AT-MSCs as the cell source by mimicking the endochondral ossification pathway. However, further studies using larger animal models are required to validate and translate these findings. The translational potential of this article: Fabricating scaffold-free cartilage from AT-MSCs with a bio-3D printer is a novel solution for bone regeneration, circumventing biomaterial-related complications. This reconstructive method shows promise for various bone defects, including trauma, revision arthroplasty, spinal pathologies, and periodontal disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.