ArticleMayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes2026
Developing and Evaluating an Inpatient Caregiver Support Program: Feasibility, Acceptability, and Perceived Impact.
Article in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and perceived impact of a hospital-based Caregiver Support Program (CSP) that supports family care partners (FCPs) of seriously ill hospitalized patients by addressing their unmet needs through emotional support, help navigating the hospital, and referrals to trusted and vetted resources. Patients and Methods: The evaluation, conducted from October 15, 2021 to January 30, 2024, was designed using a 2-phase interrupted time series. Phase 1 included prelaunch and postlaunch surveys delivered to staff and FCPs on 2 hospital units. CSP procedures were refined based on phase 1 results, and then new procedures were evaluated in phase 2 on a third unit using the same survey procedures. Feasibility was measured by the number of FCPs seen, total visits, contact hours, and time per visit. Changes in staff and FCP acceptability and perceived care quality were assessed before and after the CSP's implementation. Results: In phase 1, 253 FCPs received 282 hours of support, and 100% (8/8) of staff at postlaunch with knowledge about the CSP program strongly believed that it benefited patients and FCPs. In phase 2, 88% (53/61) of FCPs rated the program as very or extremely helpful. Care quality improved over time, but differences from prelaunch to postlaunch were not statistically significant. Conclusion: The CSP is a feasible and acceptable approach to support FCPs that is highly valued by both staff and FCPs. Program expansion may benefit both FCPs and staff by improving care quality, including communication between families, patients, and staff, and access to vetted support resources.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.