Article in PhytoKeys, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Ze WeiState Key Laboratory of Plant Diversity and Specialty Crops, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China National Botanical Garden, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China https://ror.org/034t30j35.
Li-Jia LiuState Key Laboratory of Plant Diversity and Specialty Crops, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China National Botanical Garden, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China https://ror.org/034t30j35.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1392-8927
Jing XuanBig Data and AI Biodiversity Conservation Research Center, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China Germplasm Bank of Wild Species, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences Kunming China https://ror.org/034t30j35.
Zhi-Qiong MoGermplasm Bank of Wild Species, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, China University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China https://ror.org/05qbk4x57.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0219-1213
Wen-Xiang Ou YangHunan Shunhuangshan National Nature Reserve Administration, Shaoyang 422700, Hunan, China Hunan Shunhuangshan National Nature Reserve Administration Shaoyang China.
Bing LiuState Key Laboratory of Plant Diversity and Specialty Crops, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China National Botanical Garden, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China https://ror.org/034t30j35.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6086-253X
Min LiBig Data and AI Biodiversity Conservation Research Center, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China Germplasm Bank of Wild Species, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences Kunming China https://ror.org/034t30j35.
Qiang WangState Key Laboratory of Plant Diversity and Specialty Crops, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China National Botanical Garden, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China https://ror.org/034t30j35.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0699-2034
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
The subfamily Monotropoideae (Ericaceae) comprises unique non-photosynthetic and mycoheterotrophic plants. Their extensive morphological reduction often poses significant challenges for species delimitation. In this study, we investigated an unknown
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.