Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41800203›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025

Differences in Orbital Fracture Management Among Plastic, Facial Plastic, Oral Maxillofacial, and Oculoplastic Surgeons.

Megan M Perez, Akriti Choudhary, Kevin Yang, Chiara Santiago, Gaia Santiago, Kelsey M Green, Sruti S Akella, Nicholas Callahan, Amit Kochhar, Pete Setabutr and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Megan M PerezFrom the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.
Akriti ChoudharyDivision of Plastic, Reconstructive and Cosmetic Surgery, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
Kevin YangDivision of Plastic, Reconstructive and Cosmetic Surgery, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
Chiara SantiagoDivision of Plastic, Reconstructive and Cosmetic Surgery, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
Gaia SantiagoSection of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Kelsey M GreenDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Shriners Hospitals for Children, Chicago, IL.
Sruti S AkellaDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH.
Nicholas CallahanDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
Amit KochharFacial Nerve Disorders Program, Pacific Neuroscience Institute, Santa Monica, CA.
Pete SetabutrDepartment of Ophthalmology, Illinois Eye and Ear Infirmary, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL.
Chad A PurnellDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Shriners Hospitals for Children, Chicago, IL.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Orbital floor fractures are among the most common facial fractures, yet no consensus guidelines exist for their management. Multiple surgeons from surgical specialties, including oculofacial plastic surgeons (OP), plastic surgeons, oral and maxillofacial surgeons, and facial plastic surgeons, routinely treat these injuries and may exhibit distinct clinical practice patterns. Methods: An anonymous electronic survey was distributed between 2022 and 2023 to members of the American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, the American Society of Maxillofacial Surgeons, the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, and the American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons. Respondents were queried about their clinical approaches to isolated orbital floor fractures. Results: A total of 389 surgeons completed the survey. OP were significantly more likely to delay intervention until the development of clinically significant enophthalmos ( Conclusions: Although general agreement exists among subspecialties regarding orbital floor fracture management, OP are more likely to delay surgery, forgo imaging, and avoid antibiotics. Areas of interspecialty variation highlight the opportunities for future research and the development of evidence-based guidelines.

Identifiers

PMID41800203
PMCPMC12962576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.