ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
Differences in Orbital Fracture Management Among Plastic, Facial Plastic, Oral Maxillofacial, and Oculoplastic Surgeons.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Orbital floor fractures are among the most common facial fractures, yet no consensus guidelines exist for their management. Multiple surgeons from surgical specialties, including oculofacial plastic surgeons (OP), plastic surgeons, oral and maxillofacial surgeons, and facial plastic surgeons, routinely treat these injuries and may exhibit distinct clinical practice patterns. Methods: An anonymous electronic survey was distributed between 2022 and 2023 to members of the American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, the American Society of Maxillofacial Surgeons, the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, and the American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons. Respondents were queried about their clinical approaches to isolated orbital floor fractures. Results: A total of 389 surgeons completed the survey. OP were significantly more likely to delay intervention until the development of clinically significant enophthalmos ( Conclusions: Although general agreement exists among subspecialties regarding orbital floor fracture management, OP are more likely to delay surgery, forgo imaging, and avoid antibiotics. Areas of interspecialty variation highlight the opportunities for future research and the development of evidence-based guidelines.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.