Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41800182›Full record

ArticleActa radiologica open2026

A retrospective study on diagnostic yield, tumor types, and complications of CT-guided bone biopsies.

Louise Harder, Ole Graumann, Noa Larsen Ohana, Josefine Axelsen, Maria Tækker, Flemming Kromann Nielsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta radiologica open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Louise HarderDepartment of Radiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Ole GraumannDepartment of Radiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Noa Larsen OhanaDepartment of Radiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Josefine AxelsenDepartment of Radiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Maria TækkerDepartment of Radiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0184-7364
Flemming Kromann NielsenDepartment of Radiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4187-2791

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: CT-guided percutaneous bone biopsy is a minimally invasive and effective procedure for evaluating and diagnosing bone lesions. Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic yield, tumor types, and complication rates of CT-guided percutaneous bone biopsy procedures at a single tertiary institution. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 508 biopsy procedures performed on 473 patients between March 2019 and March 2024. Patients were identified through the RIS/PACS system at Aarhus University Hospital. Data on diagnostic yield, tumor types, and complications were retrospectively reviewed and collected from electronic health and histopathology records. Complications were classified according to the Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE) classification systems. Results: The most common findings were metastatic lesions ( Conclusion: This study demonstrates that CT-guided percutaneous bone biopsy is a reliable method with a high diagnostic yield and a low complication rate. These findings support its continued role as a key diagnostic tool in the clinical management of bone lesions.

Indexed as

bone biopsycomplicationsCT-guided

Identifiers

PMID41800182
PMCPMC12966505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.