ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2026
Mechanical polarity as a driver of bone regeneration: a multiscale framework linking tension, mechanotransduction and cortical apposition.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mechanical loading is a fundamental regulator of bone remodeling, yet most conceptual models still focus on the magnitude of strain rather than its polarity. Here we propose a unified mechanobiological framework in which tensile-strain-dominant microenvironments act as primary drivers of cortical bone apposition, whereas compression-dominant fields predispose tissues to resorption and structural thinning. We synthesize evidence from long-bone bending, distraction osteogenesis, craniofacial suture biology, osteocyte mechanotransduction, and the periodontal ligament-alveolar complex to show that tensile strain consistently correlates with angiogenic activation, osteoblast lineage recruitment, and matrix deposition. We illustrate how subtle changes in load direction and boundary conditions can invert strain polarity in cortical regions that are classically considered "at risk" under bending or transverse displacement. We integrate these mechanical observations with canonical signaling pathways to outline a multiscale law of tension-guided bone adaptation and propose testable predictions for regenerative strategies. This perspective reframes bone mechanobiology around strain polarity and provides a conceptual scaffold for designing load-based interventions that exploit tensile fields to drive cortical regeneration across skeletal sites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.