ArticleDigital health
Two-stage deep learning framework for laterally spreading tumors detection using self-supervised learning and few-shot classification.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Laterally spreading tumors (LSTs) of the colorectum are flat lesions with precancerous potential that are often overlooked during routine colonoscopy due to their subtle morphology and low prevalence, posing a significant challenge for early detection. Aim: To address the scarcity of labeled LSTs data and the limitations of conventional supervised learning, we formulate LSTs recognition as an image-level binary classification problem (LSTs vs non-LSTs) using colonoscopy images. The aim of this study is to achieve reliable discrimination under limited expert annotations. Methods: A large-scale dataset of 150,168 colonoscopy images was retrospectively collected from 12,376 patients at Shanghai General Hospital between July 2021 and July 2025. The framework included two components: (1) DINO self-supervised pretraining on 150,168 unlabeled images to learn robust visual representations, and (2) Prototypical Networks performing few-shot classification with 2799 labeled training images. The model was evaluated on 601 test images using comprehensive metrics including area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC), sensitivity, and specificity. Results: The proposed model demonstrated robust performance, achieving an overall accuracy of 72.4% (95% confidence interval (CI): 67.2-77.7%), sensitivity of 74.7%, specificity of 70.2%, and ROC-AUC of 0.798 (95% CI: 0.746-0.850). Notably, the model also attained an F1-score of 0.730 and a precision-recall AUC of 0.828. The optimal decision threshold determined by Youden's index was 0.338. With a rapid processing speed of 50 ms per image, the framework is well-suited for real-time clinical applications. Conclusions: By combining self-supervised representation learning with few-shot classification, our framework reduces the need for large annotated datasets while maintaining clinically relevant performance. This approach offers a practical pathway toward AI-assisted LSTs detection in resource-constrained endoscopic settings and lays the groundwork for future integration into real-time colonoscopy support systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.