Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41800143›Full record

ArticleComputational brain & behavior2023

Quantifying individual variability in neural control circuit regulation using single-subject fMRI.

Rajat Kumar, Helmut H Strey, Lilianne R Mujica-Parodi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational brain & behavior, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rajat KumarDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY-USA.
Helmut H StreyDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY-USA.
Lilianne R Mujica-ParodiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY-USA.

Funding

FMRI Dynamic Phantom for ImprovedDetection of Resting-­‐State Brain NetworksR44DA043277 · NIDA · ALA SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS, INC. · PI KRIEGSTEIN, ALAN, MUJICA-PARODI, LILIANNE R · 2017 to 2019
$1.7M
NIDA NIH HHS R44 DA043277
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As a field, control systems engineering has developed quantitative methods to characterize the regulation of systems or processes, whose functioning is ubiquitous within synthetic systems. In this context, a control circuit is objectively "well regulated" when discrepancy between desired and achieved output trajectories is minimized, and "robust" to the degree that it can regulate well in response to a wide range of stimuli. Most psychiatric disorders are assumed to reflect dysregulation of brain circuits. Yet, probing circuit regulation requires fundamentally different analytic strategies than the correlations relied upon for analyses of connectivity and their resultant networks. Here, we demonstrate how well-established methods for system identification in control systems engineering may be applied to functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data to extract generative computational models of human brain circuits. As required for clinical neurodiagnostics, we show these models to be extractable even at the level of the single subject. Control parameters provide two quantitative measures of direct relevance for psychiatric disorders: a circuit's sensitivity to external perturbation and its dysregulation.

Indexed as

circuitcontrolcontrollabilitydysregulationfMRIperturbationstress

Identifiers

PMID41800143
PMCPMC12965462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.