Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41800130›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2026

Differences in extinction selectivity and their relationship to functional traits in late Cenozoic mollusks.

Daniel Rojas-Ariza, Luke C Strotz, Bruce S Lieberman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniel Rojas-ArizaDepartment of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, United States of America.
Luke C StrotzThe University of Kansas Biodiversity Institute, Lawrence, KS, United States of America.
Bruce S LiebermanDepartment of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying generalizable patterns of extinction selectivity is crucial for understanding the mechanisms driving extinction processes. Differences in the trait composition of extinct surviving species may represent evidence of processes of extinction selectivity during the past. Here, we leverage the information from the late Cenozoic molluscan fossil record and extant biota from the western Atlantic coast of North America, to test for differences in the trait composition of extinct and surviving species of bivalves and gastropods. We found basal metabolic rate (BMR) is the trait most closely associated with the extinction patterns observed in our data. On average across all studied molluscan species, odds of survival decrease by ∼11% for every 1-milliwatt (mW) increase in BMR, but this pattern was consistent only for bivalves. BMR thus represents an organismal trait that scales up to predict species survival in bivalves. By contrast, a variety of other functional traits shown to be important in other taxonomic and temporal contexts, including shell composition in bivalves and shell structures such as varices and the callus in gastropods, were not found to be associated with survival. This could suggest some of these traits, sometimes posited to represent important organismic adaptations, may not have played a prominent role in long term species survival in Cenozoic bivalves and gastropods. A variety of biotic and abiotic factors may likely determine the extent to which particular organismal traits influence patterns of species survival.

Indexed as

BivalviaExtinction, BiologicalFossilsGastropodaMolluscaAnimalsAnimal ShellsBasal MetabolismBiological EvolutionBivalvesExtinction selectivityFunctional traitsGastropodsLate Cenozoic

Identifiers

PMID41800130
PMCPMC12965174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.