Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41800117›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in nephrology2026

Xeno kidney: revolutionizing kidney disease treatment.

Diksha Makkar, Diksha Gakhar, Aruna Rakha

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in nephrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Diksha MakkarDepartment of Translational and Regenerative Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Diksha GakharDepartment of Translational and Regenerative Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Aruna RakhaDepartment of Translational and Regenerative Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prevalence of end-stage kidney failure has been exponentially increasing, leading to a gross mismatch between the number of patients who may benefit from transplantation and the limited supply of suitable donor organs. As renal transplantation remains a viable and the most effective option for end-stage kidney disease, the fact remains that the availability of eligible human donor organs is highly unlikely to meet the projected demand. This undermines the need for alternative strategies, including therapies and the development of transplant substitutes. In this context, xenotransplantation has emerged as a lucrative avenue for patients with renal failure who struggle to obtain a suitable graft promptly. The pig is currently the most preferred animal donor for kidney due to its physiological analogy to humans. Nevertheless, xenotransplantation is associated with certain complications as well, which broadly include the risk of hyperacute rejection mediated by preexisting antibodies to xenogeneic antigens, the stimulation of innate immune responses, and thereby the possibility of chronic rejection. Recent advances in xenotransplantation research have offered hope in overcoming these roadblocks and transforming the field of nephrology in the coming years. Genetic engineering has enabled creating low-immunogenicity grafts from donor pigs, including GalTKO (lacking α-Gal epitopes/galactose-α-1,3-galactose knockout) and gene knockouts that limit the complement system activation and clot formation. Furthermore, advances in immunosuppressive regimens, such as co-stimulation blockade and anti-complement treatment, hold great promise for xenograft acceptance and long-term results. In addition, numerous strategies are being explored to induce tolerance, such as mixed chimerism or regulatory T-cell therapy, to achieve a condition of acceptable graft tolerance without dependency on lifelong immunosuppressive treatments. Collectively, these developments support the translational potential of xenotransplantation as a stand-alone treatment or as an adjunct to standard renal replacement therapies. Despite the setbacks, ongoing preclinical research and early clinical trials are expected to refine the safety, durability, and clinical applicability in a xenotransplantation setting.

Indexed as

clinical trialsgenetic modificationsimmunosuppressivekidneynonhuman primatestransgenic animalsxenoantigenxenotransplantation

Identifiers

PMID41800117
PMCPMC12962893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.