ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Post-marketing safety profile of dengue vaccines CYD-TDV and TAK-003: analysis of adverse event reports from a European database.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fluoropyrimidine-associated gastrointestinal toxicity: pharmacovigilance reporting signals andFrontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Comparative analysis of adverse drug reaction reports for leukotriene receptor antagonists mainly indicated for allergic rhinitis and asthma: a WHO VigiAccess study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Dengue is one of the major global public health burden, particularly in endemic regions. CYD-TDV and TAK-003 are the currently licensed live attenuated tetravalent dengue vaccines, differing in serostatus indication, age range, and immunogenic design. While efficacy has been demonstrated in clinical trials, post-marketing safety data are still limited, supporting the need for real-world pharmacovigilance analyses. Objective: This study characterize adverse reactions associated with CYD-TDV and TAK-003 reported in the European pharmacovigilance database and to compare their post-marketing safety profiles. Methods: A retrospective pharmacovigilance study was conducted using the EudraVigilance database. Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) listing CYD-TDV or TAK-003 as suspected products were retrieved. Adverse drug reactions were coded using MedDRA® version 28.1 and classified by seriousness and outcome. Disproportionality analyses were performed using Reporting Odds Ratios (RORs) with 95% confidence intervals at the System Organ Class (SOCs) and Preferred Terms (PTs) levels. Sensitivity analyses included grouping clinically related PTs and restricting analyses to serious cases. Vaccine groups were compared using chi-square tests. Results: A total of 2,288 ICSRs were identified, including 1,768 (77.3%) related to TAK-003 and 520 (22.7%) to CYD-TDV. TAK-003-related reports mainly involved adults (49.8%) and females (57.9%). Although most ICSRs were classified as serious, serious reports were more frequent for CYD-TDV than for TAK-003 (81.1% vs. 76.4%; p = 0.04). Fatal outcomes were also more commonly reported for CYD-TDV (50.8% vs. 0.6%; p < 0.01). At the SOC level, TAK-003 showed lower disproportional reporting than CYD-TDV for infections and infestations (ROR = 0.07; 95% CI = 0.056-0.089), gastrointestinal disorders (ROR = 0.22; 95%CI = 0.18-0.27), general disorders and administration site conditions (ROR = 0.29; 95%CI = 0.23-0.36), nervous system disorders (ROR = 0.42; 95%CI = 0.34-0.51), cardiac disorders (ROR = 0.35; 95%CI = 0.23-0.51), and hepatobiliary disorders (ROR = 0.09; 95%CI = 0.04-0.19). Higher reporting for TAK-003 was observed for skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders (ROR = 1.98; 95%CI = 1.59-2.48). Conclusion: This real-world pharmacovigilance study suggests that TAK-003 is predominantly associated with non-serious, reactogenic adverse reactions, whereas CYD-TDV reports more frequently involve serious outcomes, likely reflecting differences in indications and epidemiological contexts. Continued post-marketing surveillance remains essential for both vaccines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.