Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41800089›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026

A highly specific fluorescent probe with facile pretreatment for rapid and accurate detection of sulfur dioxide residues in wolfberry (

Yuanyuan Ge, Wei Chen, Lingling Jiang, Kunhui Sun, Guojing Liu, Yanfeng Liu, Yibao Jin, Ping Wang, Liang Zhang, Mingtong Zhang and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Yuanyuan Ge *Shenzhen Institute for Drug Control, Shenzhen, China.
Wei Chen *Shenzhen Institute for Drug Control, Shenzhen, China.
Lingling JiangShenzhen Institute for Drug Control, Shenzhen, China.
Kunhui SunShenzhen Institute for Drug Control, Shenzhen, China.
Guojing LiuShenzhen Institute for Drug Control, Shenzhen, China.
Yanfeng LiuShenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang, China.
Yibao JinShenzhen Institute for Drug Control, Shenzhen, China.
Ping WangShenzhen Institute for Drug Control, Shenzhen, China.
Liang ZhangChengdu Institute for Drug Control, Chengdu, China.
Mingtong ZhangGansu Institute for Drug Control, Lanzhou, China.
Lan MaTsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School, Shenzhen, China.
Xie-An YuShenzhen Institute for Drug Control, Shenzhen, China.
Bing WangShenzhen Institute for Drug Control, Shenzhen, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Sulfur fumigation is a traditional technique for drying, pest control and mildew prevention in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM). However, excessive sulfur fumigation significantly impairs drug safety and clinical efficacy, rendering sulfur dioxide (SO Methods: Herein, a fluorescent probe-based method was established for the rapid and accurate detection of SO Results: The detection limit (LOD) was 1.5 μM, and the limit of quantification (LOQ) was 5 μM. The average recovery rates at low, medium, and high spiked concentrations ranged from 89.5% to 100.8%, the corresponding detection method was further applied to actual samples. Discussion: Accordingly, this method features facile pretreatment, rapid operation and detection, high accuracy and sensitivity, enabling rapid and reliable determination of SO

Indexed as

facile pretreatmentfluorescent proberapid determinationsulfur dioxide residueswolfberry

Identifiers

PMID41800089
PMCPMC12963281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.