Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41800082›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026

Aspirin use and risk of depression: a cross-sectional study.

Runa A, Huan Yu, Kun Wang, Ruotong Yang, Huairong Wang, Liuyan Zheng, Jingxian Wu, Yiqun Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Runa A *School of Public Health, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China.
Huan Yu *School of Public Health, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China.
Kun WangSchool of Public Health, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China.
Ruotong YangSchool of Public Health, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China.
Huairong WangSchool of Public Health, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China.
Liuyan ZhengSchool of Public Health, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China.
Jingxian WuSchool of Public Health, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China.
Yiqun WuSchool of Public Health, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The association between aspirin use and depression risk remains controversial. Methods: Based on the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) database from the 2011 to 2018, a cross-sectional study was designed. Depression was estimated using Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess the association between aspirin use and depression, adjusting for sociodemographic, lifestyle, and clinical covariates. To explore potential heterogeneity, we stratified the analysis by depression severity and aspirin dose categories. Results: A total of 4,887 participants with a mean age of 65.5 years were included. Of the participants, 1,421 (29%) were identified to be with depression. Aspirin use was inversely associated with the depression ( Conclusion: Aspirin use was inversely associated with depression, particularly mild depression, and the association differed by depression severity and aspirin dose. The clinical benefits and risks of aspirin should be carefully considered.

Indexed as

aspirincross-sectional studydepressionNHANESpharmacoepidemiology

Identifiers

PMID41800082
PMCPMC12963233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.