ArticleNorth American Spine Society journal2026
Traditional pedicle screw versus cortical bone trajectory in the upper thoracic spine: A technical description and retrospective comparative review.
Article in North American Spine Society journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screw is a relatively new vertebral fixation technique described for use in the lumbar spine by Santoni and Hynes et al. It has been shown to have advantageous biomechanical properties with respect to torsional and pullout strength. The evaluation of CBT in cervical-thoracic fixation has been quite limited. The primary objective of the current study was to determine the mid to long term results of CBT over traditional pedicle screw fixation in the upper thoracic spine. Methods: The current study completed a retrospective chart review of consecutive patients undergoing posterior cervical thoracic fixation in the setting of degenerative, trauma, infection and oncologic etiologies at a single academic centre. Patients with a greater than 1 year radiological follow up were included in the research study. Data was collected by an independent observer, which included patient demographics, complications. Preserved immediate postoperative sagittal alignment at 1 year was considered the primary outcome of this study. Results: Of the 47 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 18 had undergone upper thoracic spine instrumentation with CBT and 28 had TPS trajectories. The operative time was found to be significantly lower in the CBT group (p<.01). The complication rates were similar between groups with the TPS group having an infection rate of 10.7% while the CBT group had a rate of 4.7%. CBT had a higher rate of preservation of post operative alignment at greater than 1 year follow up (p<.05). Conclusions: Patients who underwent CBT fixation had preserved cervical spine alignment at their final postoperative visit. The use of CBT led to a reduction in total length of OR and trended towards a lower complication rate. Given the early findings of our study and others it is likely that CBT screws in the upper thoracic spine will become much more common place at the end of both cervical-thoracic and thoraco-lumbar fusion constructs given their demonstrated benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.