Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41800017›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pediatric dentistry2026

An

Meetu Sharma, Parul Garg, Vaibhav Vats, Bhavna G Saraf, Priya Mendiratta, Pooja Srivastava

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Meetu SharmaDepartment of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Sudha Rustagi College of Dental Sciences and Research, Faridabad, Haryana, India.
Parul GargDepartment of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Sudha Rustagi College of Dental Sciences and Research, Faridabad, Haryana, India.
Vaibhav VatsJeevan Jyoti General Hospital, Tauru, Haryana, India.
Bhavna G SarafDepartment of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Sudha Rustagi College of Dental Sciences and Research, Faridabad, Haryana, India.
Priya MendirattaDepartment of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Sudha Rustagi College of Dental Sciences and Research, Faridabad, Haryana, India.
Pooja SrivastavaDepartment of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Sudha Rustagi College of Dental Sciences and Research, Faridabad, Haryana, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim and background: Dental caries is the most prevalent oral healthcare problem worldwide, especially in pediatric patients. To manage dental caries, typical oral hygiene methods are not enough in many cases. So as to regenerate the tooth structure, remineralization is required. Thus, the aim of this Materials and methods: Both the GC Tooth Mousse (group I) and the Curodont Results: The presample count of GC Tooth Mousse and Curodont Conclusion: When tested against How to cite this article: Sharma M, Garg P, Vats V,

Indexed as

CurodontTMDental cariesGC Tooth MousseRemineralizing agent

Identifiers

PMID41800017
PMCPMC12960403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.