ArticleInternational journal of clinical pediatric dentistry2026
Comparative Evaluation of the Effect of Different Concentrations of Silver Diamine Fluoride on the Shear Bond Strength of Composite Resin on Primary Tooth Dentin: An
Article in International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Silver diamine fluoride (SDF) is a nominally invasive agent for caries arrest, but its impact on composite resin bond strength in primary teeth remains unclear. Aim: To review the effect of different SDF concentrations (12%, 30%, 38%) on the shear bond strength (SBS) of resin composite to primary tooth dentin. Materials and methods: Forty surgically removed primary teeth were assigned to four groups: Control (no SDF) and three experimental groups (12%, 30%, or 38% SDF). After demineralization and SDF application, the resin composite was bonded to dentin. SBS was quantified with the aid of a universal testing machine, and the data were subjected to statistical evaluation. Results: The control group showed the highest SBS (10.28 MPa), while SDF-treated groups exhibited significantly lower values (7.36-7.72 MPa). The analysis revealed no statistically significant intergroup disparity among the SDF concentrations ( Conclusion: SDF pretreatment reduces composite resin bond strength to primary dentin, but the concentration (12-38%) does not significantly influence the outcome. Clinicians should consider this when combining SDF with composite restorations. Clinical significance: Despite a reduction in bond strength, this study supports the use of SDF because of its therapeutic efficacy in arresting carious lesions in primary teeth, as different concentrations (12-38%) do not significantly affect composite bonding. SDF can be confidently used in minimally invasive pediatric care where long-term caries control is a priority. How to cite this article: Deka S, Chaudhary S, Manuja N,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.