ArticleInternational journal of clinical pediatric dentistry2026
Clinical Assessment of a Newer Resin-based Bioactive Restorative Cement on Class II Cavities of Primary Molars: A Comparative Analysis.
Article in International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Primary molars play a significant role in mastication, jaw alignment, and guiding permanent tooth eruption. However, their proximal surfaces are prone to decay due to anatomical challenges and cleansing difficulties, making restorative intervention challenges. While traditional materials such as dental amalgam, composite resin (CR), and glass ionomer cement (GIC) are commonly used, advancements in dental technology have introduced bioactive materials as promising alternatives, warranting further research to ensure optimal outcomes. Aim: The present study aimed to evaluate and compare the clinical performance of a newer resin-based bioactive restorative cement on class II cavities of primary molars over a 12-month period. Materials and methods: A total of 258 class II restorations in primary molars of children aged 4-9 years were evaluated over 12 months. Three restorative materials-ACTIVA™ KIDS BioACTIVE™, Tetric N-Flow Bulk Fill Composite, and GC Gold Label 2-were assessed using modified USPHS criteria. The obtained values evaluated using the statistical software SPSS 21.0 revealed a Results: The frequency distribution of variables shows score A for all criteria except for color match at baseline and at 12 months, with no significant differences in outcomes within groups over time. However, group I demonstrated a significantly better color match compared to groups II [ Conclusion: ACTIVA™ KIDS BioACTIVE-RESTORATIVE™ demonstrated a significant difference in color match at 12 months compared to other groups, while no significant differences were observed among the three materials for other evaluated parameters. Clinical significance: Moving forward toward biomimetic materials, ACTIVA™ KIDS BioACTIVE-RESTORATIVE™ is a promising material, with properties superior to that of composites and conventional GICs. Due to its remineralizing property and capability to accomplish bulk-fill restorations, it could be a great boon to pediatric dentists while performing class II restorations in primary molars. How to cite this article: Mohammed Bilal Sheriff K, Aarthi J, Elangovan A,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.