Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41799997›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pediatric dentistry2026

Efficacy and Pain Perception of a Comfort-in™ for Palatal Anesthesia in Pediatric Dental Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Shilpa S Naik, Sanjana R Kodical, Amil Joshi, Sonal Mali, Rhea Shah, Nidhi Shetiya

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07585812 (Assessing the Efficacy of the Comfort-in Needle-Free Injection System for Managing Pain and Anxiety During Pediatric Dental Injections), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07585812 nacompletednot on this map

Assessing the Efficacy of the Comfort-in Needle-Free Injection System for Managing Pain and Anxiety During Pediatric Dental Injections: A Randomized Split-Mouth Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorOndokuz Mayıs UniversityRan2019 to 2021Enrolled60ConditionsDental Anxiety, Dental Pain, Pulpotomy, Local AnesthesiaArmsComfort-in Needle-Free Injection System, Conventional Dental Injection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shilpa S NaikDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, DY Patil University School of Dentistry, Nerul, Navi Mumbai, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5660-5952
Sanjana R KodicalDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, DY Patil University School of Dentistry, Nerul, Navi Mumbai, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8940-9408
Amil JoshiDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, DY Patil University School of Dentistry, Nerul, Navi Mumbai, India.
Sonal MaliDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, DY Patil University School of Dentistry, Nerul, Navi Mumbai, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9358-1429
Rhea ShahDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, DY Patil University School of Dentistry, Nerul, Navi Mumbai, India.
Nidhi ShetiyaDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, DY Patil University School of Dentistry, Nerul, Navi Mumbai, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Needle phobia is frequently observed in children, contributing to heightened dental anxiety, uncooperative behavior, and care avoidance. The sight or sensation of traditional anesthesia needles can provoke intense emotional responses, complicating pediatric pain management. This study assesses the Comfort-in™ needle-free jet injector as an alternative, aiming to enhance anesthetic delivery, patient comfort, and cooperation during pediatric dental procedures. Aim: To assess the effectiveness of the Comfort-in™ system in minimizing pain during local anesthesia (LA) administration in pediatric dental procedures. Materials and methods: This randomized controlled trial included 64 children aged 4-9 years undergoing tooth extractions involving buccal and palatal infiltrations. Participants were randomly assigned to receive anesthesia Results: The difference in pulse rates during LA administration and during treatment was statistically significant between the two groups ( Conclusion: Considering the limitations of the present study, the Comfort-in™ system demonstrated effectiveness as a needle-free alternative for minimizing pain and anxiety in pediatric patients, while also significantly reducing the time required for LA administration. How to cite this article: Naik SS, Kodical SR, Joshi A,

Indexed as

Jet injectorLocal anesthesiaPediatric dentistry

Identifiers

PMID41799997
PMCPMC12960366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.