ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026
Research on time series prediction of microclimate in agrivoltaic systems based on the long short-term memory and attention mechanism.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Agrivoltaic (AV) systems combine photovoltaic (PV) power generation with agriculture to enhance land use and energy production. However, accurately predicting the microclimate within AV systems remains a challenge, primarily due to existing models failing to get their inherent temporal and spatial variability. Methods: To address this, this study used long short-term memory (LSTM) networks to process time-series data and incorporated an attention mechanism to adjust the importance of temporal features. The model considered two environmental parameters, including solar radiation intensity and air temperature. Data collected from experimental AV systems with different PV panel density in Nanjing, China. The performance of the LSTM-Attention model was compared with traditional machine learning methods and standard LSTM models. Results: The results demonstrated that the LSTM-Attention model outperformed the other models in predicting both solar radiation intensity and air temperature within AV systems with different PV panel density. Specifically, the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) for radiation intensity predictions decreased by 28.0%, 35.7%, and 42.1% at different coverage densities. For air temperature predictions, the RMSE dropped by 39.0% in summer and 18.1% in winter. Importantly, the LSTM-Attention model maintained stable prediction performance even in winter and rainy weather conditions. Discussion: The results indicated that the LSTM-Attention model could effectively captured the complex temporal variations in solar radiation and air temperature within AV systems, especially under varying weather conditions. The study provides theoretical support for improving crop management strategies within AV systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.