Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41799946›Full record

ArticleJournal of nursing management2026

"Awakening consciousness": Safe Care Linkage Theory From a Mixed Perspective-A Constructivist Grounded Theory Study.

Lupei Yan, Xiaorong Wu, Yunman Huang, Li Liu, Fang Wang, Xiuying Hu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nursing management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lupei YanInnovation Center of Nursing Research and Nursing Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, West China School of Nursing, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China, scu.edu.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1648-9352
Xiaorong WuDepartment of Otolaryngology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China, cqmu.edu.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3791-3271
Yunman HuangSchool of Nursing, Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, China, cmc.edu.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4942-1534
Li LiuInnovation Center of Nursing Research and Nursing Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, West China School of Nursing, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China, scu.edu.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9166-619X
Fang WangInnovation Center of Nursing Research and Nursing Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, West China School of Nursing, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China, scu.edu.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4694-6970
Xiuying HuInnovation Center of Nursing Research and Nursing Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, West China School of Nursing, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China, scu.edu.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1470-4108

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: To explore how healthcare professionals, older adults, and caregivers across different contexts conceptualize and implement safe care and develop a substantive theory that reflects their perspectives. Background: Geriatric care is delivered in a model of ongoing change, with healthcare professionals, older adults, and caregivers highlighting its impact on patient safety. However, there is a shortage of literature on how all care stakeholders conceptualize safe geriatric care. Methods: Constructivist grounded theory methodology was employed in this study. Between February 2023 and September 2024, semistructured interviews were conducted. Twenty-five healthcare professionals, 24 inpatients, 19 care workers, and 18 family members from ten hospitals and one primary health center within China participated in the study. Data analysis included initial coding, focused coding, and theoretical coding using constant comparative, memo writing, and field notes. Results: The substantive theory to emerge from this study was named "Awakening consciousness-Safe care linkage theory." This theory is informed by four levels: (a) Concept-motivation level: Generating intrinsic driving force; (b) environment-institution level: Building a safe care ecosystem; (c) practice-interaction level: Practicing safe care behavior pattern; and (d) balance-choice level: Counterbalance the unsafe care crisis. These four levels form the linkage response to implementing safe care for older adults in the hospital, and together with the escort strategy (safety criteria) and progression mechanism (feeling safe) emerging in the data, constitute the linkage ecology of safe care. Conclusion: The study presents the process of awakening the safety awareness of care stakeholders within geriatric care. Understanding the nature and interrelation of safe care linkage theory could direct practitioners, researchers, and policy-makers in better efforts to improve the safety of geriatric care. This substantive theory also provides comprehensive theoretical support for future interventions and research to form a safe care ecosystem. Implications for Nursing Management: The substantive theory provides a theoretical basis for understanding the complex nature of safe care, which illustrates the unsafe care crisis care stakeholders encounter, the criteria they obey, the strategies they use, and the influences of these strategies to practice safe care in complicated situations. Findings will assist nursing leaders in identifying areas to improve care safety and developing and integrating more effective strategies by redesigning optimal management processes to awaken care stakeholders' safety awareness and take actions suited to the linkage mechanism of a safe care ecosystem.

Indexed as

Patient SafetyAdultAgedChinaFemaleGrounded TheoryHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative Researchconstructivist grounded theorynursing careolder adultspatient safety

Identifiers

PMID41799946
PMCPMC12966611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.